Preferred Intersection: Florida T

Intersection Alternatives

Eliminated Alternative: Two-lane Roundabout

Eliminated due to level of service failure

Eliminated Intersection Alternatives

The Expanded Existing (Additional lanes)

Why was it eliminated?

•The intersection level of service D in the design year and the southbound WY 390 leg is over capacity.

The Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI)

Why was it eliminated?

•Would require multiple signalized intersections

•Would require additional overhead sign structures to provide directional guidance

• The existing below grade pedestrian crossing would potentially need to be modified.

The Reconfigured-T (Modified-T)

Why was it eliminated?

•No route continuity

•This type of intersection would require dual lefts for the westbound 22 movement and overhead sign structures would be necessary to provide directional guidance

• No adequate u-turn locations are available on WY 390 for drivers that inadvertently head northbound on WY 390

•The existing below grade pedestrian crossing would need to be modified.

•Environmental concerns exist because of impacts to adjacent wetlands.